You're in all Blogs Section

Priced-out vs Blissed-out? Where should we house hunt?

Space starved in Greater Boston?  You’re not alone.  Today’s blog post on Boston.com recognizes that Boston buyers are not just space-starved, but that the “overcrowded and overpriced” region has left people house-poor, time-starved and stressed out.  Is there is a breaking point, individually and collectively, when the high-cost of living cannibalizes QOL – Quality of Life, and people (and start-ups) begin looking elsewhere to find “their element.”

Before you trade Boston for Austin, step back and listen to the rebroadcast on “Discovering your Passion” tonight, 8-9pm on 90.9FM / WBUR Boston or online anytime.  Then ponder the soul searching questions asked by Finding Your Element by the visionary who gave the most viewed TED Talk ever – nearly 17 million views!

“Best of Breed” tools for DIY Homebuyers

If you’re at that tipping point where you’re willing to trade off quality of life for size, or consider some locations outside Greater Boston, Real Estate Cafe has a Menu of Best of Breed tools to help.  Here’s a sample:

1.  Existing sites like http:WalkScore.com enable homebuyers (primarily urban hipsters) to search beyond size, price, and number of bedrooms to locations and housing options that offer a rich pedestrian lifestyle, independent of space or price per square foot.

2.  Other BETA tools like http://planwise.com will enable users to layer personalized cost of living assumptions or life decisions, like having children or getting divorced, to help individuals or couples make better life decisions and homebuying decisions.

Housing BlissBots

3.  Still other apps will enable homebuyers to track their personal data and locational considerations to develop their own “heat maps” that reflect housing options that meet their cost of life considerations, spatial needs, and life passions. Think of them as housing “BlissBots.” If your life is rich, does it really matter how large your house is, particularly if you’re willing to trade-off proximity to passions and friends for size?

Why not? Don’t behavior surveys and research show that happiness is correlated to personal connections not house size?

Maybe that’s why some have said that Micro-Housing or A-Dorms are the new McMansions. Looking back at blog topics on Boston.com over the past two days, the big question is whether government and the private sector will develop new housing options that are affordable and family-friendly.

Commonwealth vs Paper Wealth

Without that, the wealth created by the innovation economy will continue to widen the gap between the housing haves and the have nots, rather than rebuilding commonwealth. Will the growing disconnect eventually hit home regardless of how big it is?  Here’s what the Boston Business Journal is already writing:

Can generations X and Y afford to buy their parents’ homes?
http://bit.ly/GenPricedOut  (Please share this tiny URL with friends via social networks)

Posted in Best of Breed, Creative class, DIY Homebuyers, Extreme Househunting, Idea Bar, Mapping, Price trends, Proactive househunting, reVRM, VRM

Mixed signals: Million dollar teardowns back but luxury listings up?

Luxury Towers rising in Boston

Trying to make sense of the luxury housing market in Massachusetts?  So are we.  Luxury condo towers are being reborn in downtown Boston, and million dollar teardowns — not seen since the Dot.com bubble created millions in paper wealth — are back in some communities.  But in others, the inventory of luxury single-family homes is up.  In Hingham, for example, the Boston Globe reported 14 homes priced between $1.5 and $2 million today, or more than double the six listings this time last year.  Seems out of line with yet another headline, proclaiming “High demand, low supply driving up housing prices;” but it’s consistent with our earlier snapshot of “What’s really happening with luxury single-family homes across Massachusetts?

So, has the housing market overall reached a “Tipping Point,” as the president of the Massachusetts Association of Realtor said this week?  Here’s our comment on one of the 40+ responses to that question yesterday on Boston.com:

BOSTON.COM READER:

Long time listener, first time caller. We bought in a “W” town last fall. Nice neighborhood, full of nice houses. We paid 1.3ish for a house that was listed at 1.5ish and sat from April till our purchase in November. I think we paid a reasonable price and may or may not have gotten a “deal”. I think the seller had the place listed too high initially and was stubborn on price through the Spring and Summer last year. However, I am certain that it would have sold at full ask this Spring. It has been very busy in the neighborhhod. Houses are selling very quickly. The most frightening thing is that 2 places similar to ours went under agreement before open house only to be torn down. I’d like to think I do okay for myself, and I’m certainly not overextended, but I’m not in the league that buys 1MM plus houses to tear them down. I’m just one guy, but from where I’m sitting you don’t even need a nice house to get a quick sale, you just need a nice lot in a nice town.

OUR RESPONSE:  @DearReader Generally, we prefer hard data over anecdotes, but your observations are important and disturbing as they point to the go-go Dot.com days about 12-14 years ago, when paper wealth not only generated the kind of million dollar teardowns you describe, but in places like Lincoln and Cambridge, people bought abutting lots and tore down the existing home to enhance the “privacy value” of their new McMansions.

If your neighbors have the wealth to enjoy their new homes as and end in themselves, good for them; but they should be cautious of resale value at some point in the future. Our snap shot of MLS listings early this Spring showed an oversupply of the luxury housing:

http://bit.ly/LuxLies Please share this tiny URL

Thankfully, one of the two real estate stories published in local editions of the Boston Globe makes a similar observation:

“There were no houses priced at $2.5 to $3 million in Hingham, compared with three a year ago, …However, there are more homes priced between $1.5 and $2 million — 14 now compared with six a year ago…”

http://bit.ly/LuxGlut Please share this tiny URL

Wonder if the Globe will to do their fourth real estate story on page one since March 1, asking “Why are some luxury suburban homes being left behind in the current surge of demand?”

Posted in Bidding wars, Bubble Hour, Buyer agent, Housing bubble, Luxury buyer agent, Luxury homes, Million Dollar Markdowns, Real Estate Bubble, Timing the market

Taxpayers beware: Dual agents & designated agents expose all of us to risk

A Boston home buyer recently asked Trulia readers if his “mortgage interest rate [would] be higher if the listing agent and buying agent is the same person?”  He had allegedly been asked to pay 0.5 point more because he “chose” to work with a dual agent.  Beyond his case study is a larger question to could impact millions of transactions “Should market forces penalize conflicts of interest in real estate if mega-brokers pretend they don’t exist and regulators turn a blind eye?”

Several months ago, Yale economist and co-founder of the Case-Shiller Housing Index, Robert Shiller cautioned that “we are in a totally artificial real estate market.”  My question is whether lenders are now pricing individual loans to reflect different RISK scenarios, and if so, whether that violates any laws.

Speaking of legal requirements — Using the same agent or agency to represent buyer and seller is risky, and considered an act of fraud without informed consent. That is why the state of Massachusetts REQUIRES agents to disclose that conflict of interest inherent in BOTH dual agency and designated agency before entering into any agreements. Whether the agent or agents involved comply with the state’s mandatory disclosure, or whether the buyer and seller know enough about the possible financial harm to give “informed consent” – an important legal standard — are complicating factors and add to risk.

If the rate penalty above is more than an isolated incident, could lenders be saying, we don’t care whether uninformed or misinformed buyers see the conflict of interest, we do and were going to charge a higher interest rate to reflect our RISK.  What’s the risk?

The fear of rising interest rates may tempt dual and designated agents to manipulate some buyers into “panic buying” driving bids well over asking prices, as they did in the last real estate cycle.  The video above shows an interview with the victim featured in these blog posts:

01/25/08: Misleading home buyers: Conflict of Interest? What conflict of interest?
http://bit.ly/REConJob (please share this tiny URL)

03/16/07: Double Bubble: How counterfeit buyer agents inflated the housing bubble
http://bit.ly/REConCost (please share this tiny URL)

“My so-called buyer’s agent (who promptly switched roles at contract signing without explanation), initially advised me to bid $750,000 for my house of choice, which was listed at $699,900. When I told her that such an offer was beyond my price range, she was quite adamant that I not offer anything under the list price. When I finally backed out the deal because of her bait and switch scam, I later heard that the house in question sold shortly afterwards for $682,000 – in other words, nearly $70,000 less than the bid suggested by my so-called buyer agent.”

As of 2012, nine of every ten new mortgages are backed by the U.S. taxpayer, up from three in ten in 2006. We’ve nationalized the mortgage market so million TAX PAYERS in the US are at risk if dual agents and designated agents drive bidding wars to unsustainable levels again.  Should we as tax payers insist that our financial stake in the real estate transaction be protected by buyer agents without a conflict of interest? Or at least insist on ZERO TOLERANCE conflict of interest on any real estate transaction involving a mortgage with a government guarantee?

If tax payers are guaranteeing nine out of ten mortgages, doesn’t it make sense to protect millions of transactions annually from fraud?  Sounds like good public policy to me, how about you?  Watch the video above to learn what’s at stake, and follow CAARE.org for more discussion of this topic.

Posted in Bidding wars, Buyer agent, Consumer protection, Defensive Homebuying, Dual Agency Detective, Dump Dual Agency, Foreclosure Prevention, Housing bubble, Real Estate Bubble, RECALL: Real Estate Consumer Alliance

Fact check spin & “STRESS TEST” your home buying assumptions

 FLASHBACK 2006:  No Spin Zone

FLASHBACK 2006:  With all of the press and blog posts recently about bidding wars and prices “soaring,” maybe some home buyers are too anxious to stop and question their own assumptions about rising prices or advice they are getting from peers and “counterfeit buyer agents.” One Boston.com reader commenting on Selling is now the easy part, makes this point well when he poses this hypothetical scenario:

“The $500k house you were eying a few years ago is now $625k.

Can that commenter or anyone document a consistent pattern of 25% price increases anywhere in Massachusetts in recent years, or offer proof that it is likely or sustainable?  The title of this Forbes article alone should cause one to pause, right?

Great Reflation Produces Mirage Of Recovery In Housing

Moving from that one Boston.com blog comment stream to real estate cheerleading in general, is there some point at which “industry spin” rises to false advertising or deceptive trade practices? That’s the question our recent blog post — http://bit.ly/LuxLies – raises.  Thankfully, Banker & Tradesman requested permission to republish one of our comments about “What’s really happening with luxury single-family homes across Massachusetts?” as a Letter to the Editor.

Today is Realtor Day on the Hill in Massachusetts and they are presenting their legislative agenda to the Attorney General and elected representatives statewide. If Fr. Robert J. McEwen, a Jesuit priest from Boston College and former president of the Consumer Federation of America, could elevate a discussion at the state level to become national policy, is it possible for this tech-savvy generation of homebuyers to do it again?  If we have “Truth in Lending” regulations, is it time to call for some standards of truth in real estate reporting or should we simply rely on the wisdom of crowds to post comments on blogs to debug self-serving industry spin?

If we can’t agree on what’s true, and the numbers don’t make it clear, can we at least agree that those who misrepresent the truth should be penalized?  If existing law or new legislation doesn’t hold real estate cheerleaders accountable, hopefully, victims of the last boom / bust cycle and a new generation of tech-savvy consumers will confront the “Culture of BS.”  Can you believe that was the theme of this commencement address rebroadcast by NPR / WBUR?

If the real estate industry won’t engage in it’s own “Economic Examination of Conscience,” as Pope Francis says, what can real estate consumers do to make more enlightened decisions and reform the real estate industry?

For our part, Real Estate Cafe is prepared to offer financial incentives to those who are willing to crowdsource the truth, and provide DIY tools to “STRESS TEST” your own assumptions about where housing prices are headed under different scenarios so you can decide what’s true for you. Use the link on this page to contact us to meet offline or a schedule a DEMO online.

Posted in Bidding wars, Buyer agent, Consumer protection, Defensive Homebuying, Housing bubble, Housing forecasts, Price trends, Real Estate Bubble, RECALL: Real Estate Consumer Alliance, Tipping Policy

Want to Hangout & hack headlines about housing recovery?

Keeping a close eye on housing prices
Keeping our eyes wide open for insights into Runaway prices, we’re asking readers for links and quotes from good news stories that deconstruct the 10%+ rise in median housing prices in MA during April 2013. We’re looking for hard-hitting facts by price range and product type, comparisons of underlying fundamentals vs “artificial” factors, and counter arguements that question whether the surge in prices will be short-lived or points to a sustained recovery.

If see good content or have done your own analysis (graphs, etc), can you post recommended links here? EXAMPLE: What’s really happening with luxury single-family homes across Massachusetts? http://bit.ly/LuxLies

Would you like to meet informally online or off to cross-examine what really happening across different segments of the housing market statewide? Want to exploring how the current rise in prices looks in a broader historical context of boom / bust cycles so you can make a more informed decisions about your own home buying or selling plans?

Here are three possible ways we can begin that process:

1. Review content from one of our original “Bubble Hours” as the housing bubble was cresting in 1Q2006: http://bit.ly/Bubble0206

2. Watch a video tape from 15 years ago, May 1998, entitled, “Where are Housing Prices Heading?” and compare current headlines to the surge in housing prices during the last REAL sellers’ market in Boston.

3. Update “Haunted by the Housing Market,” our slideshow comparing housing trends and underlying fundamentals before Halloween in 2000 vs 2002. Will there be another October scare for the housing and stock markets in 2013?

If we revive our Bubble Hours through a combination of Google Hangouts as well as monthly meetings offline meetings, the mutual goal would be help build alternative scenarios about where are housing prices going over the next 2, 5 and 10 years to help potential consumers, particularly our homebuyer clients, make wiser choices.

Shall we tentatively meet informally during the next several days or evening in a family-friendly space or cafe? We’ve got some potential locations in Arlington, Boston, Cambridge, and Somerville but open to other suggestions and eager to experiment with Google+ Hangouts, too.

If you’re interested, please reply using this contact form, or by calling 617-661-4046 or emailing realestatecafe@gmail.com.

Posted in Uncategorized

What’s really happening with luxury single-family homes across Massachusetts?

Price Reduction by Luxury Price Range:  Single Family Homes in MA as of 5/6/13

When it comes to real estate stats (or should I say spin?), Lily Tomlin was right: “No matter how cynical you become, it’s never enough to keep up.”  Blog posts and press releases last week from Redfin, Mass. Association of Realtors, and Hammond Real Estate are the most recent examples.  What’s your reaction to hyperbolic statements like this from a recent guest blogger on Curbed Boston? “Take my advice and at the next jam-packed open house, box out the competition and bid as much over-ask as you can.”

Before cynicism morphs into contempt, remember neither can inform home buying decisions, particularly offers, without competent, comprehensive, objective research.  That’s why one of the Real Estate Cafe’s missions is to protect homebuyers by questioning assumptions, debunking half truths, exposing facts and posing counter arguments.

Here are ten recent examples:

1.  Last week, tech-darling Redfin issued a press release on the luxury housing nationwide that was republished by the Wall Street Journal and other publications.  According to one of their local agents, “The luxury market in Boston is seeing the same level of competition and shortage of homes for sale as the rest of the market.”  Really?  That comment echoed the Mass. Association Realtors who said, “Buyers came out in force to make offers on the limited number of homes for sale in April.”  Limited, really?  Not in the luxury price range; at least not for single-family homes.

  • Fact 1: Our analysis of single-family homes priced over $1.4 million shows approximately two years of MLS inventory based on sales during a three month period ending May 6, 2013.  Unsold inventory varies by price tier,  from 16 months in the $1.4 to $1.85M price range to 57 months — or nearly five years — in the $5 to $10M price range.
  • Fact 2:  MLS stats show that Redfin was only involved in one closing over $1.4M in Massachusetts between 2/7/13 and 5/6/13, so maybe their assessment is based on luxury condos (which were not included in our ongoing analysis).

2.  Hammond Real Estate also extended the industry’s “low inventory” and “bidding war” mantras to luxury homes, insisting that “…the new norm finds buyers in multiple-offer situations due to an increasing shortage of properties. Agents are educating their clients about the current state-of-the market, and buyers are preparing themselves for situations that require them to make quick and strong offers. Many properties are being sold over the asking price, as was the case with 130 Mount Auburn Street.”

  • Fact 3:  During the past three months (2/7/13 – 5/6/13), less than 10% of single-family homes sold over $1.4M were over asking price — that’s a mere 15 sales across Mass!
  • Fact 4:  Only 7 of those 15 homes sold for more than 2% over the seller’s asking price!  Big deal, right?
  • Fact 5:  One of the two listings featured in Hammond’s press release had been on and off the market for more than a year and a half before selling for $2 million — or more than 36% — below it’s original asking price of $5.5 million in September 2011.  Would you believe the final sales price was also $777, 800 below the assessed value published in the MLS?

As that sale proves, it’s still possible to get a single-family home in Massachusetts for approximately $1 million below it’s original asking price.

  • Fact 6:  In fact, seven of the 24 single-family homes sold over $2.85M during the three month period we studied were “Million Dollar Markdowns.” (see footnote below)

3.  So our question is why “bid as much over-ask as you can,” when less than 10% of luxury single-family homes sold during the past three months were over asking price and when you may still be able to save six to seven figures?

  • Fact 7:  As our graph above shows, price reductions of more than 10% are common across all six luxury price ranges studied in our three month snapshot.  So why does the press focus on the seven sales more than 2% over asking price, when 205 luxury single-family listings have reduced their asking prices by at least 10%?
  • Fact 8:  Almost 15% of the homes priced over $10M have reduced their asking price by more than 20%; so apparently the more money you can spend, the more you can save!
  • Fact 9:  Would you believe that 37 luxury single-family homes across MA have reduced their list price by approximately $1M off the original asking price, and another 67 have reduced their price by approximately one half million?

Call for public investigation?

Compare our fact checking above to industry statements and ask if there is a point at which real estate spin becomes false advertising or part of a pattern of deceptive trade practices?

The press release we’d like to see would be out of the Attorney General’s office or maybe the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. It would read:

  • Fact 10:  Only a handful of bidding wars drove prices $100K or more over asking price on luxury single-family homes in Massachusetts during the three months studied.
  • Fact or just our professional opinion?  For the second year in a row, an unsettling number of those involved in-house sales at well-known real estate brokerages.

Won’t it be wonderful if the same press released announced, “Federal and state regulators are investigating the role that dual agents and designated agents — aka “counterfeit buyer agents” — play in manipulating buyers, particularly in-house buyers, involved in bidding wars”?

Footnotes:

  1. Rounding up, our research defines “Million Dollar Markdowns” as listings that have been reduced by $850,000 or more from their original asking price; and half million dollar markdowns were reduced $450,000 or more.
  2. This blog post was written before learning about the lead story in Banker & Tradesman entitled, Luxury Market Soaring, dated tomorrow, Monday 5/20/12.  Unfortunately, we are not subscribers so cannot access that article online.  That article should be worth reading because it will most likely include all residential sales in Massachusetts, whereas our three month snapshot was limited to listing data published by MLSpin.com which covers most but not all of the state.
Posted in Bidding wars, Bubble Hour, Buyer agent, Defensive Homebuying, Dual Agency Detective, Luxury buyer agent, Luxury homes, Million Dollar Markdowns, Price reductions, Sweetest Deals

Call for Complaints: Top 10 Issues Facing Real Estate Consumers

Smoking gun exposes in-house Bidding Wars

Friday, Boston.com’s real estate blog screamed, Misleading listings have buyers fuming.  The complaint drew few echoes; instead readers said, in one way or another, there are much bigger problems in the real estate industry that need reform.

Monday, thousands of Realtors descend on Washington, DC for their annual Midyear Legislative Meetings & Trade Expo, where they’ll lobby members of Congress. If you could get a private audience with Senator Elizabeth Warren, what would you tell her is wrong with the real estate industry?

What if there were a political organization made of homebuyers, not Realtors, and they used online surveys, grassroots listening sessions, post-its (like those shown above), and handheld writeboards at open houses this weekend to broadcast their complaints?

What would yours say?

To their credit, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) may be interested in your feedback, too.  NAR’s Strategic Planning Committee — which meets Tuesday in Washington to discuss next steps in it’s “REthink the Future of Real Estate” campaign — hopes to engage 20,000 members in local workshops to challenge them to envision different scenarios.  One of them, the Ostrich scenario, pokes fun at agents, brokerages and association officials who want to keep their head in the sand and pretend like “the good old days” will continue indefinitely.

Unfortunately, the return of bidding wars seems to be rewarding this attitude in the short run but it won’t last long.

Change is inevitable and survey after survey says that real estate agents will morph into consultants at some point in the future.  In the meantime, pioneers like the Real Estate Cafe have been offering a money-savings Menu of Fees & Rebates for nearly 20 years.  Would you believe one of our Harvard our clients has rebated enough to save three years of college tuition, and an MIT client has saved two years?

Over the past two decades, we’ve also tried to act as consumer advocates, championing reforms to protect and empower homebuyers and sellers like you.  Here’s our list of the Top 10 Issues Facing Real Estate Consumers in 1995, the year we went into business.  What’s on your list?

http://bit.ly/RETop10

Want to vent?  We’d love your help updating that Google spreadsheet above and invite you to participate in our new Google+ Community — Real Estate Consumer Alliance — to update the Top 10 list for 2013.  If you prefer, use this form to schedule a meeting offline so we can listen to what your individual complaints or if you want to participate in a group discussion of problems that might interest Senator Warren and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.  If there is interest, maybe we’ll host our own virtual Town Hall Meeting.  Want to collaborate?

Posted in "We" companies, Bidding wars, Commission Reform, Consumer protection, Consumer surveys, Dual Agency Detective, Real Estate Consumer Bill of Rights, RECALL: Real Estate Consumer Alliance, Unconference

Crowdfunding vs GreedFunding: How to redirect the “Double Dip”

Designated Conflict

Surveys show that the majority of consumers believe that real estate agents are overpaid.

Does that mean individual agents are greedy?  Not necessarily but it does mean that the prevailing two-sided commission is obsolete, and the amount of compensation that comes out of an individual transaction can be excessive in high cost markets.  It’s a systemic problem, a form of systemic greed.

But some unscrupulous agents do exist, specifically those who put their financial self-interest ahead of yours or their legal obligations. In market niches where supply exceeds demand, the temptation is high now for listing agents — particularly luxury listing agents — to collect both sides of the commission from pocket listings, a.k.a. private inventory, whisper listings, quiet listings and a host of other code words for in-house sales.

Think insider trading.

How should you respond and how can you redirect the Double Dip to save money and achieve social good?  Here are some Do’s and Don’ts:

DO’S

1.  Get ahead of pocket listings by being proactive. If you do, you’ll also avoid the 10 hidden costs of reactive home buying. (link)

2.  If a home is already in the MLS, work with an exclusive buyer agent. If you don’t, you’re leave money on the table, perhaps unintentionally, which gives the listing agent (one individual) or list agency (their brokerage) a double pay day.

3.  The Real Estate Cafe and Consumer Advocates in American Real Estate / CAARE.org recommends working with a buyer agent who discounts or rebates part of their fee already built into the sales price of any MLS listing.  See rebate calculator on the US Department of Justice website.

4.  If you work with the Real Estate Cafe, we offer a variety of 100% commission rebate options and encourage our clients to donate a portion of their rebate to a non-profit organization.  Think of it as a form of crowdfunding.

DON’TS

1.  Never agree to let an agent talk you into dual agency.

2.  If asked to sign a designated agency consent form, say no and use this Pledge of Allegiance to find an agent who will advocate for you without a conflict of interest.

3.  Even if you think you know more than the smartest agent in town don’t go it alone. Demonstrate your intelligence by acting in your own financial interest: find a buyer agent who offers a rebate so you can rebate part of it forward.

SAVINGS GOAL:  ONE YEAR OF COLLEGE TUITION

How much money can our clients save? Our goal is help each family save enough money over a lifetime to fund one year of college tuition. So far, one of our Harvard families has funded three years tuition, and an MIT family has funded two.  To our delight, both families have donated thousand of dollars to non-profit organizations.

From our perspective, that’s a triple victory and we hope DIY homebuyers like you would like to learn more about how to use real estate rebates to: (1) reward yourself, (2) use some of your savings to crowdfund a cause, an artist or arts organization, or a start-up like those Presidential Challenge DEMOs we saw today at Harvard’s i-Lab, and (3) help reform the real estate compensation model.

Posted in ASAP: AIDS Shelter Alliance Partners, Buyer agent, Change Agents, Commission Reform, Consumer protection, Crowdfunding, Dual Agency Detective, Dump Dual Agency, Fee-for-service, Unbundling the Commission

Discouraged house hunters: Time to Persevere or go Proactive?

Steve Jobs on Perseverance

The Real Estate Cafe turns eighteen this year, and as the highlights below demonstrate, we’re coming of age.  But while perseverance may be the key to successful entrepreneurs, it may be costly for prudent homebuyers who sat out the last boom / bust cycle waiting for housing prices to “correct” only to see artificially low interest rates reinflating prices again.

Is it time for DIY homebuyers to persevere with conventional home buying practices or to be proactive?  What would Steve Jobs do?

Like Jobs, we look real estate upside down and backwards to better serve clients.  So we’ve identified 10 Hidden Costs of “Reactive” House Hunting and use them to explain the money-saving benefits of an experimental process we call “Proactive House Hunting.” Please watch this preview, sign-up for a DEMO, and share this link with friends: http://bit.ly/ProactPreview

RECENT HIGHLIGHTS:  April 2013

1.  To mark the 20th Anniversary of the Consumer Revolution in Real Estate, a two-day conference hosted at the World Trade Center in Boston, featuring Ralph Nader and more than 30 other panelists, we launched RECALL: Real Estate Consumer Alliance on Google+ to re-energize reform efforts.

2.  Redesigned and relaunched of our website on WordPress, which includes nearly 800 blog posts chronicling, among other things, the real estate recession.  Our Menu of Fees & Rebates, including the 100% rebate featured in the Wall Street Journal, has been simplified and explained in a slideshow.

3.  Our “Game Changing” vision of real estate trended briefly last Fall on Twitter. Twenty years after we did, the National Association of Realtors says it time for their members to Rethink the Future of Real Estate.  If you’re a past client or someone who has ever visited our fee-for-service, money-saving business model, you know that’s been our mission since day one.

We need your help to continue our mission, and we’re willing to reward you with an attractive ROI: “Return on Invention.”  Whether you’re a homebuyer, past client, friend, or investor, please contact us for details.  

Posted in Buyer agent, Creative class, Crowdfunding, Fee-for-service, Proactive househunting, Real Estate Bubble, RECALL: Real Estate Consumer Alliance, reVRM, Social funding, Timing the market, VRM

Avoid 10 Hidden costs of “Reactive” house hunting

10 Hidden Costs of "Reactive" Home Buying

As rent day approaches and bidding wars continue, Real Estate Cafe invites existing and potential clients, particularly first-time homebuyers, to step back and assess what they’ve learned from the return of a “sellers market’ in Greater Boston, particularly after this blog post today on Boston.com:

Crazy price spikes in Lexington, other upscale towns

We’re eager to host a variety of table top presentations offline at convenient locations through the next 36 hours, and begin hosting webinars online to explore a variety of alternative approaches you won’t learn about in Homebuying 101 or from “counterfeit buyer agents.”  Hard hitting topics include:

1.  10 Hidden Costs of “Reactive” house hunting (PREVIEW slides & schedule private viewing)

2.  Homebuying in a sellers’ market:  Then & Now

3.  Defensive Homebuying

Please call or text us at 617-661-4046 or email realestatecafe@gmail.com to learn about possible times and locations; or to schedule a private, table top demo in a cafe, your office or home.  Here’s our tentative blitz campaign:

5/1/13 UPDATE:  PREVIEW slides and use this form to schedule a private showing.

TODAY:  Monday, April 29, 2013

4:00pm, Panera Cares, opposite Boston City Hall:  Open comps:  We’ll take a deeper look at some of the headlines in the Globe story, trying to figure out what’s really going on under the headline

5:15pm, Panera Cares, opposite Boston City Hall:  10 Hidden Costs of “Reactive” House hunting

7:00pm, location to be announced:  10 Hidden Costs of “Reactive” House hunting

8:45pm, location to be announced:  10 Hidden Costs of “Reactive” House hunting

TOMORROW:  Tuesday, April 30, 2013

10:30am, iYo Cafe, Davis Square:  Open Q&A with Chris Grande, Personal Financial Planner, plus 10 Hidden Costs of “Reactive” House hunting

Posted in Bidding wars, Consumer protection, Defensive Homebuying, Proactive househunting, Real Estate Bubble, Real Estate Roundtables, reVRM, Savings & Rebates, Seasonality, Timing the market
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
Meta
HTML Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com

Switch to our mobile site